TNTW Issue 6,
2003.
Welcome to
Trends in Nanotechnology Weekly, a round-up of
articles and press releases that have appeared on
the web, er, recently, on the subject of
nanotechnology.
This week's issue is sponsored by the
journal Nanotechnology
From January 2003
Nanotechnology
goes monthly following a hugely successful
editorial relaunch last year. Submit your paper
and benefit from publishing in a journal with
high impact factor, huge visibility and rapid
publication times. Just send your article to [email protected].
More details here.
Nanotechnology's
partner online publication, nanotechweb.org,
brings you the latest nanotechnology news and
features, as well as a directory of suppliers,
employment services, a searchable research
database, an events calendar and more. See for
yourself.
|
|
NanoTrends is
the first major European event that is
completely commercial in focus and brings
together nanotechnology leaders from all
industries across Europe. Organised in
cooperation with the European NanoBusiness
Association, this event will be the annual
meeting point for the European nanotechnology
community. Further information at http://www.nanotrends.de/
|
|
CMP
Cientifica, the world's
leading nanotechnology business information
company, and IIR, the world's largest
international conference organiser, have joined
forces to develop the World
Nano-Economic Congress - an
international series of comprehensive events
that bring together the thought leaders in
nanotechnology and
business. |
CMP Cientifica spins off
Cientifica
CMP
Cientifica announces the launch of London- and
New York-based Cientifica Ltd, the global
business information and consulting arm of CMP
Cientifica, with offices in London, New York and
Mumbai. Cientifica provides business information
and consulting services to companies ranging
from start-ups to fortune 500 companies on 3
continents.
To see how
Cientifica can help your business, visit http://www.cientifica.com/
or call Tim Harper on +34 91 640 7185 or, in the
US, Pearl Chin on 212 861 3298.
|
+++GENERALLY
NANO
--Nanobots
around the corner?-- --Swarm
intelligence for US military-- --Drexler
on molecular manufacturing-- --The
ETC Group keeps up the pressure-- --NanoEngineering
Advisory Council interview with Ralph
Cavin-- --The
first Encyclopaedia of Nanoscience and
Nanotechnology-- --I
fought the law and the lawyers won--- --Ah.
Here are some now . . .-- --Another
nano book-- --And
another . . . -- --Lifeboat
for the Prince-- --Nano
dollars for nanotech research in the
US--
+++GOVERNMENT
AND INSTITUTIONS
--Nanoscience
major in China-- --Nanoscience
centre for Taiwan-- --Korean
government invests in nano-- --US
House of Congress nanobill-- --Vocal
locals lobby
lab--
+++VC
AND INVESTMENT
--Milcom
partners with Nanosteel-- --New
report from Lux Capital-- --A
new VC interested in nano-- --Mini-submarine
sensors-- --InMat
gain $1.5 million in funding round-- --On
the latest investment round for
Nanosys--
+++NANOBIZ
--Applied
Nanotech sign a deal with Mitsubishi-- --Millennium
Cell announce agreement with Samsung-- --Bug-be-gone
nano-mesh-- --Patented
pens position precisely-- --Forced
feedback for AFMs-- --Nanomagnetics--
+++RESEARCH
--Stretchy
conductors-- --Bell
Labs organic transistors-- --Guiding
light-- --Nanotubes
blowing in the wind-- --Buckyballs
target anthrax-- --Tracking
nanocapsules inside cells-- --Tiny
drug capsules shine-- --Patterned
particle sandwich-- --DNA
motor keeps on running-- --The
light at the end of the tunnel-- --Colorimetric
biosensors-- --High-frequency
semiconductors-- --Hydrogen
storage using MOFs-- --Climbing
the waals-- --NASA
nano network mimics
brain--
A recent
report published by Business Communications Co. on
robotics (intro here)
makes the extraordinary claim that nanorobots are
close to becoming a commercial reality. Even if
one assumes they are talking about really simple
devices, such as, perhaps, a DNA- or protein-based
actuator in a nanofluidics chip, then the
statement is still very optimistic when compared
with the views of those working in such areas.
However, it seems they are thinking of something
much more ambitious since these machines are
expected "to literally revolutionize our daily
existence." What on earth have BCC been reading?
This is really not going to help bring clarity to
the raging debates about nanotech that confuse
science fiction with
reality.
If BCC's
announcement doesn't get the nanophobes worried,
we're sure this will, even if it's not nanotech.
The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA) are funding research into swarm
intelligence. Oo-er, Prey, here we
come.
Eric
Drexler, who has recently gone from invisible to
ubiquitous, writes a brief essay on the molecular
manufacturing concept.
They
continue with their unfortunate twisting of
reality (which is a shame, since some of the
things they write are quite sound) by describing
the reaction to Prince Charles's concerns about
grey goo as a 'straw man' created by industry and
Nobel laureates. It would surely have been
somewhat strange for people to react to the
Prince's utterings by talking about something
completely different - the choice of grey goo as
the subject was his. Moreover, it was the ETC
Group themselves who got him on to the subject. If
anyone is creating straw men, it is ETC, by
claiming that the sceptical voices are
premeditated attempts to manipulate public opinion
by some fictitious 'nanotech industry'. Why ETC
can't be happy with simply having concerns that
they don't think are being addressed by a wide
range of companies and governments, we don't know.
It seems they feel a need to have some sort of
Goliath with which to do battle, so they have
created one. When they claim that industry is
making the same mistakes as with biotech, by
assuring us that it will not make mistakes, ETC
are again inventing an opposition that is not
there. Most industries being, or soon to be,
affected by nanotech are actually paying no
attention at all to the concerns of ETC or Prince
Charles. Ironically, this actually supports the
assertion that they are making the same mistakes
as with biotech - failing to proactively address
concerns in a way that will keep this whole debate
sane. So ETC are right here, if for the wrong
reasons.
We also
thought ETC had moved away from the threats of
some far-distant molecular manufacturing
capability to focus instead on some matters that
really do warrant attention, if not their extreme
over-reaction, such as nanoparticles and
nanotubes. It seems not. Here they tell us that
some form of molecular manufacturing will be a
reality sooner than later and they seem determined
to mix up the futuristic with the present in
people's minds. This is a sad tactic and we
suspect it will hinder prospects for dealing with
nanotech responsibly.
However,
they then play down grey goo in favour of their
new bęte noir, green goo. With this they manage to
move into territory they are long familiar with -
genetic engineering. They don't point out,
however, that genetic engineering is not
nanotechnology. We fully agree that the rapidly
developing capabilities in genetic engineering do
offer some truly scary prospects in the quite near
future, although much of the fanciful stuff the
ETC focus on, such as 'playing God' by creating
whole new life forms from scratch, is not where
the danger lies but is merely a way for ETC to
pull a few traditional Luddite strings, with the
'playing God' accusation being an all-time
classic. Their determination to demonise the whole
of nanotechnology by trying to pull it under the
genetic engineering umbrella is only going to
distract from the necessary tasks of dealing with
the true dangers of cheap and easy genetic
engineering, or finding out where dangers, if any,
may exist in nanomaterials. Please guys, take a
good look at what you are doing and ask yourselves
whether your almost religious enthusiasm to flex
your considerable PR muscles in a battle with some
fictitious nanotech Goliath is in the interests of
the health and safety of humanity. Will you be
able to live with yourselves if, by engineering a
spectacle that will attract the most attention and
the biggest crowds, you allow the true dangers to
slip by unnoticed?
Ralph Cavin,
Vice President of the Semiconductor Research
Corporation, talks about his organisation's
involvement with nanotechnology and how he sees
the future of nanotech. Ralph will be at the IEC's
NanoEngineering World Forum on 22-24 June.
We'll be there too.
Dr. Hari
Singh Nalwa, the founder and Editor-in-Chief of
the Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, has
published the first Encyclopaedia of Nanoscience
and Nanotechnology. The ten-volume encyclopaedia
is now available at pre-publication
prices.
Law firms
are advising emerging technology companies to take
legal advice in order to 'protect' their
technology. Sound advice. Although it looks likely
that it will be abused and, instead of protecting
IP the high cost associated with defending any
claims will be used as a method to put competitors
out of business. In the long run it'll be a
relatively small gain for a minority of companies,
although you can be sure that lawyers will win on
all fronts.
The
Atlanta-based law firm Arnall Golden Gregory
launch a Nanotechnology Practice.
Popping up
like mushrooms and dating faster than sliced
bread, Bill McKibben, the author of "The End of
Nature", has written another book foreseeing
dangers facing humanity and the environment. The
new book "Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered
Age" covers hot topics from bioengineering to
nanotechnology. There's an interview with the
author here.
"Nanocosm:
Nanotechnology and the Big Changes Coming from the
Inconceivably Small", by William Illsey Atkinson,
gets mixed reviews, one of which (linked above)
made us chortle.
The Prince
of Wales's recent expression of concern about the
possible risks associated with nanotechnology has
netted him the Lifeboat Foundations' prestigious
Guardian award. Nothing to do with the brave
volunteers who rescue sailors in distress, this
Lifeboat Foundation, in case you haven't heard of
them, is dedicated to providing solutions that
will "safeguard humanity from the growing threat
of terrorism and technological cataclysm". That
said, they're not anti-technology since they are
pursuing every avenue, including self-sustaining
technologies, using AI and nanotechnology, with an
emphasis on self-contained space arks (seriously).
Although they exhibit a marked preference for
space arks they are not dismissing out of hand
more down-to-earth projects such as underground
bunkers and caves. So if you think it's time to
start reviewing your escape options (it's never
too early), visit their rather attractive
site.
Wayne Crews,
the Director of Technology Policy of the CATO
Institute, argues that now is the time to stop the
US Government wasting the public's money on
nanotechnology. Unfortunately, if forthcoming
technologies were "purely the products of
capitalism and entrepreneurship, not central
planning, government R&D, and pork barrel" you
would be receiving TNT Weekly by pigeon post.
Ironically, the author of "Contract with America"
was one of nanotechnology's greatest fans this
time last year. This year threatening Iran and
Syria seems to be higher up the political agenda.
The Hainan
University are now offering a nanomaterial science
and technology major, the first in
China.
Taiwan's
biggest computer component manufacturer, Hon Hai
Precision Industry Co., is helping to set up a
hi-tech industrial park.
The Korean
government has shown its commitment to developing
the country's nanotechnology programme by
investing $2 billion for
2003.
By a
landslide vote, the US House of Representatives
agreed to Representative Boehlert's bill to up the
amount of money put aside for nanotechnology to
$2.4 billion over the next three years. Apparently
this figure does not include the defence
department's budget. The final vote was cast when
Republicans managed to defeat Democrats who wanted
to add two amendments, one ensuring that some of
the funds were put aside for research into health
and environmental effects and the other for energy
research. The house, however, agreed to fund a
committee of "non-scientific and non-technical"
Americans tasked with considering the possible
threat of nanotechnology, which will probably help
us fill some column inches in the not too distant
future.
Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory's plans to construct
a molecular foundry has raised objections from the
local population who are saying that the decision
was made with insufficient public process and that
the lab did not conduct an environmental impact
report. The lab's attorneys are maintaining that
they have complied with and exceeded the legal
requirements for the
project.
Milcom help
launch new ventures in the tech arena. They've
recently taken NanoSteel under their wing.
Nanosteel produce a nano-enhanced coating that
makes steel more resistant to corrosion
(previously mentioned in weeks 49 and 50).
Lux Capital
are releasing their 'Nanotech report 2003'.
Pint-sized pundit Josh Wolfe, whose stock-picking
skills seem to be more consistent than his
nanotech writings, bizarrely
compares nanotechnology to the rearming of
Nazi Germany while informing us that "Pattern
recognition is a fancy name for learning from the
past." We can see all those AI professors rushing
to rewrite their
textbooks.
High Peaks
Venture Partners has been established to provide
investments for technology firms in the New York
region becoming known as 'Tech Valley'
.
It's not the
submarines that are miniature, it's the sensors.
PEL Associates, who make smart materials, received
$100,000 from the Pentagon to develop their
submarine sensors.
InMat,
producers of a nanocomposite coating for rubber,
most famously to make tennis balls keep their
bounce longer, have recently attracted a further
$1.5 million in venture capital
funding.
Nice
coverage from The Deal, but it doesn't say much
about the technologies and the chances of
commercialisation. Though we haven't seen such
views in print, we have heard several people
express the view that Nanosys's popularity is
created by the stars involved in the company more
than by any great commercial prospects. To be
sure, one of their early target markets, sensors,
is hugely competitive and being attacked by a wide
range of technologies. Our feeling is that greater
prospects may lie in some of their longer-term
goals, but it could be argued that when you put so
much talent and IP together then something has to
come out of it. Time will
tell.
Applied
Nanotech, who believe they have the IP sewn up on
field-emission applications of nanotubes, have
signed an R&D and commercialisation agreement
with Mitsubishi.
The Samsung
Advanced Institute of Technology (Samsung's
central research laboratory) and Millennium Cell,
who make fuel cells, announce a development
agreement to develop fuel-cell-powered consumer
devices.
Start-up
Seldon Technologies claim to have produced a mesh,
called Nano-Mesh, which can completely sterilise
all the bacteria in water, presumably meaning it
doesn't kill them but just stops them having
babies. The novel way the product works is clearly
explained: "It works sort of like a filter."
Sounds revolutionary to
us.
NanoInk, the
dip-pen nanolithography Northwestern spin-out,
announce the availability of their first piece of
hardware (they put some software on the market a
few months back). The tool is claimed to enable
researchers to build structures with virtually any
material at resolutions of less than 15
nanometres.
Pacific
Nanotechnology have released a sensory feedback
mechanism for their AFMs, allowing you to 'feel'
nanoscale features. 3rdTech were the first in this
market, with their Nanomanipulator, but many
academic institutions have had their own
custom-built systems for a long time.
Nanomagnetics, the UK company that
is using proteins to make magnetic disks, claims
that their system will be able to achieve disk
densities of around 5000 gigabits per square
centimetre.
Using a
process that deposits layers of metal nanometres
thick onto a plastic surface, researchers at
Princeton have developed conductors that can
stretch. The film is stretchable by up to 22%
while continuing to conduct
electricity.
The
inventors of the original transistor are working
on smaller, more flexible, lower-cost, printable
organic versions. They aren't the only ones, of
course.
Researchers
at the California Institute of Technology and
University of Southern California have found a way
to guide light over short distances through
channels that are several times narrower than the
wavelength of the light. According to the article,
visible light normally can't be focused more
accurately than 200 nm (wavelength is not
specified - TRN, who are normally excellent in
their coverage, have been getting a little sloppy
of late). The approach the researchers used was to
exploit the near-field effect (the basis of a
popular microscope, the near-field scanning
optical microscope) to create plasmons
(oscillations in electrons caused by interaction
with the light) that could then be directed down a
chain of metal nanoparticles representing a
waveguide with an aperture only 90 nm wide. This
is certainly a very interesting area of research
in terms of the devices that may one day be built,
although it is early days yet. A very similar
achievement by Austrian researchers, directing
surface plasmons, was reported back in Issue
3.
Researchers
at Duke University have created nanotubes up to 4
mm long, which the article claims are the longest
single tubes ever made. The often rather vague
reports from Rensselaer Polytechnic over the last
year have suggested tubes much longer than this
but maybe the difference is that those were in
bundles rather than single (it is surprisingly
difficult to measure the length of a nanotube,
incidentally, especially in a bundle since, to
confirm that you have a single nanotube, you need
to start at one end and follow it continuously to
the other. For a 4 mm nanotube this is equivalent
to trying to follow a piece of string over a
distance of about 4 kilometres, which is not so
easy on the nanoscale). But never mind the size,
it's the alignment that is interesting here,
caused simply by the direction of flow of the feed
gas. By performing the process a second time with
the wafer on which the tubes are grown rotated 90
degrees, the researchers have managed to make
grids. The simplicity of the technique suggests
that this could be quite an important
development.
Researchers
at Rice University are attempting to use
buckyballs for drug delivery. In particular
they're talking about targeting anthrax spores and
delivering the necessary drugs directly to
affected areas. We wonder if there might be an IP
issue here with C-Sixty.
Researchers
at McGill University, Quebec, used fluorescent
molecules attached to the nanocapsules (referred
to here as micelles) to track where they went in
living cells. The aim is control of drug delivery
at a sub-cellular level.
In a similar
vein to the previous piece and similar recent work
using quantum dots, researchers from the
University of Hamburg, the Max Planck Institute in
Germany and the Russian National Research Centre
for Antibiotics have made a microcapsule that can
communicate its progress in delivering drugs using
infrared, which passes nicely through biological
tissue. The capsules are far from nanoscale but
the light emission is achieved using nanoparticles
embedded in the shell of the
capsule.
Using metal
microparticles in a solution sandwiched between
two glass plates and then applying an electrical
current, researchers from Argonne National
Laboratory and the Russian Academy of Sciences
have found a way to form various patterns. Though
only microscale in this case, the technique could
be used to create
nanostructures.
An
interesting advance in the area of nanomachinery
from Oxford University and Bell
Labs.
It's not
that long since light emission from nanotubes was
first demonstrated at Rice. Now IBM have managed
to get them to emit in the frequency range used in
optical networks. Sounds commercially interesting
but, like the nanotube transistors, this is not
something that shows any sign of being scalable
any time soon. There's also somewhat deeper
coverage here.
Scientists
at the University of Illinois have developed a
biosensor using gold nanoparticles laced with DNA,
adding to the recent spate of sensor news related
to gold nanoparticles. When the sensors come into
contact with a metal ion they change colour, the
intensity of which gives an indication of the
concentration of the metal ions present. The
researchers have found that they can create
sensors suitable for different concentrations and
targeted at different metals. They hope to be able
to create an array of sensors that can detect a
variety of different metals at varying
concentrations, aiming for application as a
detector of environmental contamination by toxic
metals.
Using a
silicon-germanium semiconductor nanostructure,
scientists from the University of Delaware have
managed to produce electromagnetic waves in the
much-sought-after terahertz frequency range, which
has a number of promising applications, not least
in medical imaging.
Using a
nanoporous metal-organic framework, or MOF,
researchers at the University of Michigan
(collaborating with a number of other US
universities and departments) have managed to
produce a material capable of storing up to 4.5%
of hydrogen by weight, at low temperature. More
importantly, they believe that they have found the
route to being able to store up to 6.5% by weight,
the figure set by the US Department of the Energy
as being the point where hydrogen-powered vehicles
become economically viable. For a more general
article, with some coverage of others working in
the field, see here.
In TNTW last
year (weeks 35 and 36), we reported that a team at
the University of California at Berkeley were
examining the mechanism that enables geckos to
climb walls. They discovered that the cumulative
effect of weak van der Waals forces between the
tiny hairs on the gecko feet and a surface was
sufficient to give the gecko its mighty grip. A
member of the research team, now at Carnegie
Mellon, has gone on to develop synthetic gecko
hairs that already have notable sticking
power.
Researchers
at the NASA Ames Research Center have found a way
to grow networks of connected carbon nanotubes.
The network appears to work in the same way as the
synapses in the brain and shows a capacity for
fault tolerance and
self-correction.
This week's issue is sponsored by the
journal Nanotechnology
From January 2003
Nanotechnology
goes monthly following a hugely successful
editorial relaunch last year. Submit your paper
and benefit from publishing in a journal with
high impact factor, huge visibility and rapid
publication times. Just send your article to [email protected].
More details here.
Nanotechnology's
partner online publication, nanotechweb.org,
brings you the latest nanotechnology news and
features, as well as a directory of suppliers,
employment services, a searchable research
database, an events calendar and more. See for
yourself.
|
|
NanoTrends is
the first major European event that is
completely commercial in focus and brings
together nanotechnology leaders from all
industries across Europe. Organised in
cooperation with the European NanoBusiness
Association, this event will be the annual
meeting point for the European nanotechnology
community. Further information at http://www.nanotrends.de/
|
|
CMP
Cientifica, the world's
leading nanotechnology business information
company, and IIR, the world's largest
international conference organiser, have joined
forces to develop the World
Nano-Economic Congress - an
international series of comprehensive events
that bring together the thought leaders in
nanotechnology and
business. |
CMP
Cientifica spins off
Cientifica
CMP Cientifica announces the
launch of London- and New York-based Cientifica
Ltd, the global business information and
consulting arm of CMP Cientifica, with offices
in London, New York and Mumbai. Cientifica
provides business information and consulting
services to companies ranging from start-ups to
fortune 500 companies on 3 continents.
To see how Cientifica
can help your business, visit http://www.cientifica.com/
or call Tim Harper on +34 91 640 7185 or, in the
US, Pearl Chin on 212 861 3298.
|
TNT Weekly
Copyright CMP Cientifica
Contributing
editor: Paul Holister, [email protected]
Research and
contributions: Steve Willett, [email protected]
REDISTRIBUTION is allowed only
with permission. You may circulate copies of TNT
Weekly by manually forwarding it, providing (1)
you forward the issue in its entirety, (2) no fee
is involved, and (3) you forward no more than
three issues to any one
individual.
After that,
please encourage your correspondents to send an
e-mail to [email protected]
to get their own *free*
subscription.
Some links
may require free registration to be viewed.
Links to
material in languages other than English can be
translated at http://world.altavista.com/
or http://www.systransoft.com/.
Quality is variable and longer articles are often
not fully translated.
If you are
using the text version of TNTW, some mail programs
may break long URLs. If this happens, just cut and
paste the full URL into your browser. The trailing
'}' on some URLs has also been reported to give
problems.
For readers
not so familiar with the nanotech world, we have a
small glossary of terms and abbreviations we
commonly use without explanation. This can be
found at Cientifica's
nanotechnology
glossary |