Search the web
Yahoo! News Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Search. Compare. Save.    
Personalize News Home Page
Yahoo! News   Mon, Oct 25, 2004
Search for    Advanced
News Home
Top Stories
U.S. National
   Weather News
Most Popular
Oddly Enough
News Photos
Most Popular
Full Coverage

Full Coverage
More about
Biological and Chemical Weapons
Related News Stories
Scientists: Biological Weapons Pose Major Threat Reuters via Yahoo! News (Oct 25, 2004)
Biological threat greater than nuclear or chemical: British report AFP via Yahoo! News (Oct 25, 2004)
Army Finalizes Bioweapon Test Expansion AP via Yahoo! News (Oct 16, 2004)
Opinion & Editorials
Fighting bioterrorism at home at St. Petersburg Times (Jul 26, 2004)
Bronx cheer for Bioshield delay at Washington Times (Jul 14, 2004)
Feature Articles
Biological terrorism becomes more real at (Sep 22, 2004)
When Bioterror Moves Next Door at Boston Globe (Aug 8, 2004)
Related Web Sites
Chemical and Biological Weapons Resource Page
Biological and Chemical Weapons: What They Are and What They Do
Chemical and Biological Weapons Nonproliferation Project

News Resources
News Alerts
President Bush
John Kerry
News Alerts

News via RSS
Science News

All RSS Feeds

Science - Reuters
Scientists: Biological Weapons Pose Major Threat

Mon Oct 25, 9:28 AM ET
Add to My Yahoo!  Science - Reuters

By Jeremy Lovell

LONDON (Reuters) - Biological weapons that can wipe out whole populations pose one of the biggest threats to the world today yet remain almost completely uncontrolled, the British Medical Association said Monday.


It urged the United States to stop blocking attempts to strengthen the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) when it comes up for renewal in 2006.

"This technology could be used by sub-state terror groups and eventually by deranged individuals," Malcolm Dando, author of the BMA's study, Biological Weapons and Humanity II, told reporters at a news conference.

He warned that the development of biological weapons designed to target specific ethnic groups was coming closer to reality, and said it was already theoretically possible to recreate devastating viruses like the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic that killed 40 million people.

The anthrax attacks in the United States in 2001 and the engineered nerve agent fentanyl used by the Russians to end the Moscow theater siege with disastrous results in 2002 showed that biological weapons already existed, Dando said.

Yet the BTWC, which dates back to 1975, contains no means of monitoring and no powers of enforcement.

"The best way of describing it is as a gentleman's agreement," said Dando, who is head of peace studies at Bradford University.

He said there were strong international mechanisms controlling nuclear and chemical weapons, but virtually nothing to control what he termed the "riotous development" of biotechnology.

Dando said the United States, which under President Bush (news - web sites) had turned its back on many international accords, was the key reason the BTWC treaty remained weak after 19 years.

The U.S.'s powerful biotechnology industry has put pressure on the administration not to sign up to international rules fearing they could stifle research, he said.

But Dando noted that Bush's opponent in next week's presidential elections, senator John Kerry (news - web sites), had made positive comments about strengthening the treaty.

Russia, which was known to have developed a major biological weapons capability in the closing stages of the Cold War, had also kept a very low profile on the issue, he said.

"There are still several of its military laboratories that have not been opened up for inspection. You have to wonder why," he said.

Vivienne Nathanson, head of science and ethics at the BMA, said it was vital scientists got involved in self-regulation to try to ensure experiments and information were not misused.

"The real key to biosecurity, to not having to deal with deliberately spread epidemics, is to make sure that these materials are not produced," she said. "You can never provide 100 percent security but you can create safeguards."

Too lax controls and Armageddon could be round the corner, but too rigid regulation and vital advances on health sciences could be stifled.

What was needed was a code of ethics covering scientists and governments and sensible international laws fully enforced.


"If we don't do the prevention side we have to be prepared for those weapons to be used," Nathanson said.

Story Tools
Mail to Friend  Email Story
Message Boards   Post/Read Msgs (181)
Printer Version   Print Story  
Ratings: Would you recommend this story?
Not at all 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 Highly

Prev. Story: Kyoto Too Little to Fix Warming - UN Climate Chief (Reuters)
Next Story: Scientists: Biological Weapons Pose Major Threat (Reuters)

More Science Stories
Man's TV Triggers Satellite Rescue System, FCC Investigates  (
Shaded moon will be last eclipse of 2004  (AFP)
Soyuz Capsule Lands on Kazakhstan Steppe   (AP)
NASA Spacecraft to Pass Close to Saturn's Moon  (Reuters)
Puzzling Milky Way Companion Found  (


Degrees in Education
Online Graduate Degrees in Education
Browse All Education Degree and Certificate Programs
from Yahoo! Education

Copyright 2004 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Copyright 2004 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Questions or Comments
Privacy Policy -Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Ad Feedback